ANNEXURES.

ANNEXURE A-1

Phone – 728

Anupam Kumar Dasgupta (Press Correspondent)

Darogapara, P.O.& Distt. Raigarh, M.P. Pin - 496001.

Respected Sir,

In response to your advertisement in Deshbandhu, News - Paper, It is to inform you, that the bride is my sister and I am in search of a groom for her. My sister is M.A. (Hindi), B.Ed. and teacher in a Govt. School. Salary in four figure. Age 32 years, Height 5’ whitish colour, healthy homely, courteous and export in house-hold work. We are from a reputed Vaidya family of Barishal. Our gotra is Shalenkan. We are one brother and three sisters. Two sister married and sister-in-laws are well placed in Barakar and Patna respectively. I am press reporter of the Hindi daily 'Nava Bharat' and English edition 'M.P. Chronicle' our father expired and mother alive. I inform you the description of my sister and our family. If you are interested for such bride, then please let me correspond to the above address and oblige. Please accept my 'Namshkar' and ‘Sadar Sambha

Your's

(Anupam Kumar Dasgupta)

01.12.87 (English).

// True Translated Copy //



ANNEXURE A-2
DUPLICATE
(1) Name and Surname :Ku. Rama Das Gupta D/o Late Shri Prafulla Kumar Das Gupta

(2) Caste, religion or race :Bramhin, Hindu

(3) Residence and postal address : C/o Anupam Kumar Dasgupta, Darogapara, Raigarh

(4) Father’s Name, surname and last address : Late Prafulla Kumar Dasgupta, Darogapara, Raigarh

(5) Date of birth by Christian era as nearly as can be ascertained.: 20.12.1950 Twentieth December Ninteen hundred fifty.

(6) Exact height by measurement : 4’ 11’’

(7) Personal marks of identification : Mole bellow the left eye.

(8) Signature of Government servant and dates of each Signature. :

(9) Signature and designation of the office or other officer attesting of the above signatures with the attestation.

Sd/-

DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL 0FFICER

RAIGRH DISTRICT

The entries in this page should be renewed or re-attested at least every five. The signatures in cages (8) and (9) Should be dated.

//True Copy//


ANNEXURE A-3

IN THE COURT OF 4TH ADJ. J.G. D.J. BILASPUR



Arup Kumar Gupta ...Petitioner

Versus

Smt.Rama …Respondent



Case No. 19-A/93

Fixed for 05-12-1994



APPLICATION U/S 151 C.P.C.



The aforesaid petitioner beg to submit as under:-

1. That the petitioner has filed this petition for decree but the respondent is presently residing with petitioner causing him mental harassment and physical torture.

2. That it is impossible to live with respondent if she commits reckless act petitioner will by put into trouble. Even otherwise it is not safe to live with respondent who has turned hostile and may commit any offence any time.

3. That since more than a year the petition is undecided due to dilatory tactics adopted by respondent.

4. That petitioner has applied for his own transfer from Jamnipali but the respondent indirectly influences management not to transfer petitioner who also cause undue harassment with the help of Communal elements.

It is therefore, prayed that the respondent be directed to live separately in the interest of justice.

Sd/-

Petitioner

Dated 05-12-1994

//True Copy//



ANNEXURE A-4



Information of the police interference in the non-cognizable offence under Section 155 Cr.P.C.

P.S. Darri, District Bilaspur, Sanha



No.5/95 dated 30.1.1995 1497/30-1/95



Complainant : Arup Gupta, S/o. Shri Sushil Kumar Gupta, aged about 41 years, R/o.Yamuna Vihar, Quarter No.B-609/Block No.1.P.S. Darri, District Bilaspur.

Opp.Party : Smt. Rama Gupta, aged about 45 years, R/o.Yamuna Vihar, Quarter No.B-609/Block No.1, P.S. Darri, District Bilaspur.

Place of occurrence : Yamuna Vihar,

Date of incident : Time continued from 23.1.1995

DESCRIPTION

The brief description of the case is this that opp.party was sleeping on the cot in her room in the night on 23.1.1995. She had kept the room heater beneath her cot and the fire suddenly caught in the clothes of respondent by heater and her left leg effected. Complainant rush her in the N.T.P.C. Hospital and he reported it to the police station. Enquiry was done by the Head Constable No.86 and it was found on enquiry that there was burn due to fire on left leg. On this fact, the dispute arose between husband and wife on 30.1.1995 and complainant does not want to live

with the opposite party. Rama Gupta, opposite party does not want to give the household articles apart from his clothes. Mrs. Thakur and other neighbouring persons ….(illigible). Signature of petitioner was taken on the report and he adviced him to go to the court for the decision on the report.

Sd/- Illegible

30.1.1995

Sd/- Petitioner

// TRUE TRANSLATED COPY //



Annexure A-5 :
W.S (T.C)

ANNEXURE A-6

ANUPAM KUMAR DASGUPTA Press Correspondent

Dated: 5.2.1999

Fax: 07759-33240

To

Shri R. Bose

Addl.General Manager (Incharge)

National Thermal Power Corpn. Ltd.

P.O. Vikas Bhawan

Jaminipali, Korba.

Sub: Information regarding the sub standerd criminal acts of Shri Arup Kumar Gupta, Employee No.25268 employed in E.D.P. and Satcom in N.T.P.C. Korba with request for penal action.

Sir,

My younger sister Smt. Rama Dasgupta (MA, B.Ed.) Assistant Teacher, N.T.P.C. School was married to Shri Arup Kumar Gupta on 8th March, 1988 as per Hindu rites and rituals. He not only cheat & torture at a streach but also demand money for the sake of conversion to Islam. Now, he has brushed aside all the social values. Though Shri Arup Kumar Gupta is already married still then he married again Smt.Sunita Halder, wife of S.K.Roy, Women Health worker and a girl born by this illicit relationship at S.E.C.L. Hospital, Baki Mongra in the month of November/December 1999. Smt. Haldar is a government employee and she is wife of another person. This act of Shri Arup Kumar Gupta, (Employee No.25268) is illegal, again illegal and criminal and it is requested you to take the appropriate penal action in regard to this act.

Kindly bring it to my notice, that the appropriate action has been taken against Mr Arup Kumar Gupta and keep it mind that if you failed to initiate such penal proceedings against this characterless worker Arup Kumar, and as a result of your ignorance/ negligence, my younger sister compailed to take any serious steps thereafter, or being hopeless she take steps like committing suicide or if any physical assault caused on her by Arup Kumar Gupta or Gondas appointed by him then the entire responsibility of it will be upon you.

Waiting with the hope of appropriate proceedings.

Yours faithfully,



Sd/-

(Anupam Kumar Dasgupta)

Copy to :

Shri Nand Kumar Patel

Home Minister

Government of M.P. & Minister-Incharge Korba District – for information and necessary action

// TRUE TRANSLATED COPY //



ANNEXURE A-7

From:

Smt. Rama Gupta MA, B.Ed. Teacher

C/o. Arup Kumar Gupta

Quarter No.B-609 Yamuna Vihar

Jaminipali, Korba, M.P.

To

Smt. Bhaswati Bose

Chairperson, Maitri Mahila Samiti

N.T.P.C. Jaminipali

Sub: Information about the indecent and criminal activity of Mr. Arup Kumar Gupta, Employee No.25268, Assitt gr. II, techno service, with requests for appropriate proceedings.

Respected madam,

I am wife of Shri Arup Kumar Gupta, (Employee No.25268) who working in the Wireless of Personnel Department, N.T.P.C. and I am teacher in the Government school. My marriage has been solemnized as per Hindu rituals and Bengali customs. But it is the painful truth that after marriage the behaviour of my husband towards me has been amount to financial and mental exploitation. He does not bring his salary and the materials received from N.T.P.C. to home and it is not known to me, where he spent all these. Whenever I ask, he misbehaves with me, and the household expenditure is being run from my salary.

In this regard, I already bring the facts to the notice of NTPC management, but the action taken by them, not known to me. Now my husband has started crossing all the limits. He kept Smt. Sunita Haldar, Women Health worker as co-wife and as per his statement he has an illegal child. Smt. Sunita Haldar is the wife of some other person. This conduct of my husband is liable for serious action by the NTPC Management and he should be punished for this misdeed. A case under Section 394 of I.P.C. has been registered against him by Korba Police and he is facing prosecution. My husband tried to obtain divorce by a drama of converting himself to Islam and he defeated by the ruling of M.P. High Court. The copy of the judgment of the M.P. High Court has already been sent to the General Manager, NTPC, Jaminipali, Korba and Chief Personnel Manager, NTPC, Jaminipali, Korba.

Therefore, my husband should be punished by the NTPC management for his aforesaid misdeeds which has not yet been done. It is also painful and an evidence to the insensitivity to women torture by management. Moreover the gift, traveling facility which is given to my husband by the NTPC management time to time is not reached to home by my husband Arup Kumar Gupta, and it is not known where he uses it. He takes loan of huge amount without my knowledge and also he misuses it. He took loan for constructing the house but he is not constructing any house.

Therefore, it is my humble request that no loan should be sanctioned to him without my knowledge and consent. The articles which due

to him from the NTPC organization, may be given to me and action may please be taken against Arup Kumar Gupta for his misconduct. Alongwith this prayer.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

(Smt. Rama Gupta)

W/o. Arup Kumar Gupta

R/o.B-609/ Yamuna Vihar, Jaminipali, Korba, M.P.

Dated : 20.9.1999

Copy to

1. Shri Rajendra Singh, Chairman-cum-Managing Director, National Thermal Power Corporation, Scope Complex, 6, Industrial Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi for information and appropriate action.

2. Shri K.K. Sinha, Director (Personnel), National Thermal Power Corporation, Scope Complex, 6, Industrial Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi for information and proper action (Alongwith the

photocopy of the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. Jabalpur).

3. Shri R. Bose, General Manager, N.T.P.C. Vikas Bhawan, Jaminipali, Korba for necessary action.

4. Director (Personnel), N.T.P.C./ Pragati Nagar, N.T.P.C. Korba for necessary action.

(Smt. Rama Gupta)

W/o.Arup Kumar Gupta

Quarter No.B-609 Yamun Vihar Jaminipali, Korba, M.P.

// TRUE TRANSLATED COPY //



ANNEXURE A-8 :

Petition (T.C.)

ANNEXURE A-9 (colly);

Witness.



ANNEXURE A-10

In the Court of District Judge, Korba (Chhattisgarh)

Presiding Officer : R.S. Sharma

Civil Suit No. 37A/2004

Arup Gupta @ Anawar S/o. Late S.K. Gupta

aged about 47 years, Service in N.T.P.C.

R/o.Wireless K.S.T.P.S, N.T.P.C. Jaminipali, Korba

District Korba. ..Applicant/complainant

Versus



Smt. Ramadas Gupta, aged about 50 years

D/o. P.K. Dasgupta, Occ. Teacher (Govt.)

R/o. B-609 Yamuna Vihar Jaminipali, Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh. ..Non-applicant/Opp.Party



On behalf of the applicant/complainant– Arup Kumar Gupta Applicant in person

On behalf of non-applicant/respondent – Adv. V.K.Gupta.

9.11.2004

Applicant himself is present.

Shri V.K. Gupta, Advocate present with non-applicant

Non-applicant witness Din Dayal Agarwal present.

Non-applicant got herself examined and got her witness examined and got the cross-examination done. Thereafter she was allowed to go.

Non-applicant concluded her evidence.

Applicant prayed that he should be granted an opportunity to adduce the evidence. He wants to call the sister in law (bhabi) of the non-applicant as a witness.

Counsel for the non-applicant has objection on it.

The evidence of the applicant has been closed in this case.

It has been ordered in the judgment dated 24.6.2004 of the Hon’ble High Court passed in First Appeal No.71 of 2001 that the case should be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of receipt of judgment.

As per the order of the Hon’ble High court, approximately one month time has been remaining, and applicant got enough scope to prove his case, and applicant closed the scope of his evidence, and regarding that letter, for which witness wanted, ie., Exhibit P-1, is already admissible as evidence earlier, therefore no need to call any other witness. Therefore, the prayer of the applicant is rejected.

Parties sought for time for the argument and time granted.

Put up the case for the final arguments on 17.11.2004.

Sd/- Illegible

R.S. Sharma

District Judge

/ TRUE TRANSLATED COPY /



ANNEXURE A-11

IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE DISTRICT JUDGE OF KORBA (C.G.)

Case No.:13A/2000

Date Fixed for :17.11.04



Arup Kumar Gupta ...................... Petitioner

VERSUS

Smt. Rama Dasgupta ..................... Respondent

Petitioner most respectfully submit the following:-

1. The Order dated 24.06.04 of the Hon’ble High Court of Bilaspur (C.G.) consists of three separate components. The Civil suit no. 13-A/2000 to be disposed of:-

(a) On merit

(b) According to Law

(c) Within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment.

2. The copy received by the Vth ADJ, Bilaspur on 5.7.2004. Therefore the cut off date for six months is 4.1.2004 i.e. fourth January of the year Two thousand five.

3. The witness of respondent was over at about 5.00 PM. on 9.11.04. From 10.11.04 to 15.11.04 the court was closed. Petitioner applied for certified copy of witness on 16.11.04 for express delivery and the date given is 19.11.04 Photocopy attached as Annexure A -3.

4. On her witness, respondent given a new matter that she do not know who wrote the hand written inland letter (annexure P 1 ), whose handwriting is actually the handwriting of her sister in Law (Bhabhi). Even she refused to confirm the handwriting of the person and whether the said letter written by her sister in law or not. In fact this witness will criminate respondent & her sister in law under sec.416, 419, 120 A & 120 B of IPC, for which they trying to avoid the witness on it. A separate case also going on, in another court against the respondent by petitioner under the above section of IPC. But the witness of sister in law of respondent is extremely necessary for the purpose of this case there fore she should be called on for witness.

5. The request for calling the sister in law of respondent as witness made vide annexure with is still pending.

6. Before final argument it is extremely necessary.

(a) To call sister in law of respondent as witness to clear the matter.

(b) Petitioner should be allowed to give witness on the allegations imposed at the time of respondent’s witness on 9.11.04.

(c) Petitioner not yet received the certified copy of witness of respondent and others, which is extremely necessary for argument.

(d) A gap of at least seven days required for final hearing from the date of obtaining certified copy of witness for purpose of study the matter.

Without these final argument is not possible and if the final argument going on there will be a irreparable loss & injustices to the petitioner.

If the above injustices done, the case can not be disposed off on merit & according to law.

7. There fore petitioner prayed that :-

(a) To call the sister in law of respondent as witness.

(b) Petitioner be allowed to give witness on the allegations imposed on witness of respondent.

(c) A date for argument after witness of sister in law & certified copy of witness.

Prayed accordingly.

Sd/-

(A.K.Gupta)

Petitioner

Date: 17.11.04

Place: Korba



Annexure P-5

IN THE COURT OF FOURTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE BILASPUR (MP)

Misc Case No. 19A of 1993

Arup Kumar Gupta .. Applicant

Versus

Smt. Rama Gupta .. Non applicant

REPLY TO THE PETITION UNDER SEC. 13(2) FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE UNDER THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.

Non applicant submits the following statement as under:

1. That the averment made in para – 1 of the application is admitted to the extent that non applicant has been married as per Hindu rites and rituals and rest of the averments are denied.

2. That the averment made in para -2 of the application is admitted.

3. That the averment made in Para -3 of the application is denied because of the non applicant having no knowledge of it. Non applicant has neither mentioned about the conversion of the religion by the applicant or about being influenced with the principles of Islam nor any kind of the approval or consent for the conversion of the religion has been taken by the applicant from non applicant.

4. That averment made in para – 4 of the application is specifically denied because of it’s, not being just and proper, in fact it is an excess of statement.

5 That averment made in para – 5 of the application is specifically denied because of not being just and proper. If the religion has been converted into Islam then under such circumstances applicant is not entitled to get the relief of any kind under the provision of Hindu Marriage Act because of not being Hindu on the date of petition.

6. That averment made in para-6 of the application is admitted with this addition of the fact that, inhuman and cruel behaviour has always been done with the non applicant by the applicant due to which, no child has born with wedlock of applicant and non applicant.

7. That the summons of the case shall be given because of the facts mentioned in para – 7 of the application not being just and proper. Thereafter it appears after the perusal of the petition in question that the basis of the conversion of the applicant into Islam Religion for the dissolution of the marriage (illegible)

8. That averment made in para – 8 of the application is denied because of not being just and proper. Applicant has been married in the year 1988. After the marriage, applicant has been behaving in cruel and inhuman manner with the non applicant.

9. That averment made in para – 9 of the application is denied because of not being just and proper. This fact has been specifically denied that applicant has the right to get the decree of dissolution of marriage against the non applicant.

10. That the petition filed by the applicant is not maintainable because of the facts mentioned in para–10 of the application not being just and proper and petition is liable to be rejected because of being outside the jurisdiction of this Court.

11. That no permanent arrangement of the maintenance of the non applicant has been made by the applicant. Non applicant resides in Jamunipali and heavy expenditure is incurred in visiting the Bilaspur on every hearing and in the fee of advocate. The petition has been filed in the Hon’ble Court with malafide intention and ulterior motive.

12 It has been mentioned by the applicant about his conversion into Islam which is evident from the perusal of the petition in question. Persons can get the relief under the provisions of section 2 of Hindu Marriage Act 1955 who is Hindu on the date of filing of petition or who is the follower of Hindu religion other wise the petition in question is liable to be rejected because of not being legally maintainable.

13 That threat has always been given by the applicant by behaving cruelly in regard to stridhan of non applicant and self acquired moveable and immovable properties and applicant has been torturing non applicant economically, mentally and physically.

14. That applicant has made an effort to tarnish the social, family image of the non applicant by the said conversion of religion.

15 That applicant is not entitled to get the decree of dissolution under the petition in question.

16. That when no reaction was shown by the non–applicant because of the cruel and inhuman behaviour of the applicant then applicant got so angry that he file the present petition in order to defame the non-applicant after losing his mental balance, which is not legally maintainable.

17 That non applicant reserves the right of filing the written statement as per the requirement in support of her written statement. The petition is not maintainable because of not being verified.

Therefore, it is prayed that the petition of divorce is liable for rejection with cost.

Sd/- non applicant Bilaspur. Dated :- 26.06.1995